International Retail Buying & Merchandising

International carriage Branding International Retail Buying & Merchandising appraise the various buy constructions that exist in order to support a sell purchasing modus operandi and the impact of these buying structures on the situations and responsibilities of the retail emptor. give illustrative examples to support your answer. Within the retail environ workforcet customer satisfaction and company profitability argon a crucial consideration in the w ar choice of the buyer ( diamond & Pintel, 2008).The range of the buyers duties testament depend on the size of the vexation and can be seen as three principal(prenominal) buying approaches profoundised, decentralised and a combination of the two. Throughout this essay the buying structures willing be explored in depth and the advantages and disadvantages of each will be underlined. The contrast between these three approaches will highlight further the roles and responsibilities of the retail buyer and how they chang e depending on the type of organisation. The buyers role within the retail sector is an extremely crucial wiz.A fashion buyer awards a range of carrefours targeted at a specific clientele within a certain toll range to hopefully gain profit for a retail company (Kang, 1999). Therefore getting the merchandise collection correct has been described as the railway locomotive of success within retailing (Aufreiter et al. , 1993). A successful buyer requires a variety of skills including communication, calculation, analysing market positions, the power of negotiation and should alike be creative (Varley, 2005).There be three roles of a buyer as stated by Hirshman and Stampfl (1980), firstly as a change agent where the buyer inspires the consumer to consider purchasing newborn and exciting goods, secondly as a gatekeeper where the buyer will coordinate the movement of the product from supplier directly to the customer. Finally the opinion draw role will encourage the customers out look however this does not necessarily result in a direct purchase from the company.The chance upon activities which a retail buyer must(prenominal) carry out are as follows analysis of market opportunity which suspensors understand consumer buying behaviour, the creation of a merchandise plan which will incorporate a range of goods and merchandise within that category. The buyer needs to then select and build a self-colored relationship with a supplier to give the business a private-enterprise(a) advantage. The development of the product will ensure an exclusive feel of the brand, precisely orient to meet the desires of the retailer and their customer. These goods will then me packaged, presented and promoted accordingly (Fernie et al. 2003). The buying role can differ between companies due to the size of the organisation, the budget allocated, classification of merchandise, the turn of events of employees and where the stores are located (Diamond & Pintel, 2008). These attr ibutes clearly define the organisational structure that a business will use to approach the buying role. The first of the three approaches, which large cosmic string stores favour, is a centralised structure. This is where a whole buying team are involved and all purchase decisions are made at period Office.Usually buyers will be in possession of separate departments and select a specific product range, for example lingerie or footwear (Goworek, 2001). As the size of a company grows, the buyers role becomes more than intense as they deal with larger sums of money, a greater number of products and competition increases. More staff is brought in to help spread the workload and this in turn separate the buying role from the marketing one. This can be perceived as a negative as buyers are required to be kept up to date with promotions and merchandising decisions (Rosenbloom, 1981).On the other hand, there any many advantages of buying taking place in Head Office all over store leve l. Stores with full pinnacle-of-cut-rate sale data capture systems can accumulate up to date information on sale trends and buying patterns for each item and store them to allow forecasts to be more precise. This helps provide buying power with the negotiation of supply prices and allows a single point of communication for supply base. Subsequently allocating more time to the buyer to analysis market trends and discovers new products for their customer.In short the cost of buying function is lower as economies of scale are achieved. Tighter quality control techniques can be applied to improve production and delivery performance whilst buying and stock control choices are levelled across all stores. This gives store managers the opportunity to focus on motivating their staff and the running of their store (McGolderick, 2002). However while centralised purchasing does have its advantages, it can occasionally not recognise the needs and variation in demand of an individual store as we ll as that of the store manager.With buyers running(a) from Head Office quarters there is very little informal communication with the various units making the organisation less adaptive to marketplace and environmental changes (Stampfl, 1978). Every store will have a different set of customers and product assortment. However as the retailer is not in control of buying the merchandise they must work with the allocated product from the central buying team (Wang, L, 2010). This in turn can demotivate managers at local anesthetic anesthetic levels as they feel their gossip or component to the buying activities is invalid.All buying teams within centralised structure main goals are to become the front runner in the marketplace. Marks and Spencer are one of the many chain stores which are constantly reviewing their buying strategy to deliver lower stock levels, shorter lead times and greater flexibility (marksandspencer. com, 2013). decentralised merchandising can be found within indep endent retailers selling products with stable demand. In such cases the store managers often take on the function of buying locally as well as many other numerous management roles.It is favoured when a number of decisions need to be made at store level based on customers needs. A well-known brand which takes this type of approach is Johnson & Johnson who offer a range of health care products. This is due to the various businesses they are involved in which have different customer desires. By having a diverse range of businesses, with more than 250 free units, the company has managed to modernise and grow regardless of its size (Singer & Abelson, 2010). Giving store level management more opportunity to have an element of control over the buying for their stores.A method of enhancing customer service and the stores efficiency against the large companies who use the centralised method is to allow the small retailers to cater fully to their local product choice (Varley, 2005). A major plus of using a decentralised structure is the ability for a store to adapt to change within the local market without having to wait for the centralised buying team to give the go ahead. This can boost self-esteem of store managers as they feel they have a large contribution with the buying decisions.The CEO of Johnson & Johnson, William Weldon stated a negative with having a decentralised approach, the head of the company will have to gain a good deal of trust with their store managers to make the correct decisions. Having decisions spread out amongst the company can also lead to inconsistency across the organisation. Weldon also pointed out that by having a decentralised approach it allows his business to advance internationally. They count on local employees in overseas markets to make critical business decisions (Kokemuller, n. ). A combinative structure is the third approach that a retailer may adopt where the ability to purchase takes place at two central and local level. Th is may involve the central buyers buying the core lines for all the stores and products to suit local needs are bought in turn by local managers. This method has been utilised by international nutriment retailers whose head office buy main brands sold in all stores. The local management are in control for obtaining goods from local suppliers in order to fulfil customer tastes.In 2001 Waitrose itself has encouraged the use of local produce by stocking over two kibibyte lines alongside other large chains such as Asda and Co-operative Group (Morrell, 2010). Another method used within this structure involves a centralised buying team who select a range of goods from which store level managers choose according to the desires of their consumers. Whilst this does not entirely give the opportunity for the store manager to select exact products for their outlet, it does allow them to have some say within the buying decisions.An example of this would be the franchise restaurant Subway, wher e their Head Office takes control of the marketing, menus and food quality but the store managers themselves take control over matters such as hiring and training of staff (DuBrin, 2009). A further illustration would be the historied clothes apparel Benetton, who create a variety of styles. Although the individual licensee cannot buy from outside suppliers, the single units have the opportunity of selecting the clothes from the company that they believe will suit best with their customer (Diamond & Pintel, 2008).A combinative method fulfils the demands and expectations of customers through the organisations ability to buy centrally, prices are more competitive and the local taste is also met (Bruce, 2004). The roles and responsibilities of a retail buyer can vary in terms of what purchasing structure is used within a business. For a small organisation the buyer can be involved with the sales and promotional sides of the business whereas in large chain stores they have various positi ons at different levels such as buying directors, managers, buyers, buying assistants and trainees (Goworek, 2001).Single units opt for a decentralised buying approach where the store level management are responsible for all buying tasks. patronage owners operate their own store as they believe they could provide a tailored product and service specific to their customer. Independent stores generally sell one arrangement of products or restricted amounts of merchandise this is purchased by the store level manager. Within single units the owner takes on many roles but with chains, that have hundreds of stores, the role of the buyer becomes more constrained and focused on purchasing (Diamond & Pintel, 2008).A crucial skill of the buying team within a centralised structure is to be efficient communicators as they are constantly speaking with suppliers and other departments. As the distance between stores increase, it becomes more challenging for a buyer to make snitch visits to each s tore. These units are controlled at Head Office with very limited contact occurring between buyer and store manager. The main focus being purchasing and communication is achieved through telephone and e-mail, information is also accumulated via electronic reports (Diamond & Pintel 2008).Within a smaller business the range of merchandise is usually wider, for example mens business-wear which would include suits, shirts and ties. With large chain store such as Bhs and Oasis, buyers are given a more concentrated product range for subject mens shirts. This in turn leads to further pressure to generate more sales for their specific department. In comparison to individual stores which acquire a more flexible buyer with a broader skill set to assist with quality control.The roles and responsibilities of a buyer within a combinative structure is a mixture between the buying department at Head Office purchasing the core lines of a range and the store managers contribution to providing the s tore with local good they believed to cater to needs of their customer. This could be difficult to manage as purchasing will take place at both levels, for this to be successful, the general manager and the buying team would need to communicate regular so that merchandise within the store was consistent.Overall a buying structure is needed in order to help support a retailing company deliver its market with a carefully selected product range, providing them with a competitive advantage and in turn hopefully generating profit. Three main approaches were evaluated and linked with different types of businesses which best suited them. Centralization is more broadly used by larger retailers such as chain stores decentralization provides a structure for independent retailers and thirdly a combination of the two which takes elements of both of these to create a core line as well as using local produce.When companies are considering both the handling of data and of merchandise then the deci sion must be made as to which is the preferred method. A centralised approach allows organisations to have a larger buying department with greater efficiency which becomes more focused on areas of purchasing. Some retailers see this as restricting as store managers have limited say within this process, therefore they opt for a more flexible method offered within the decentralised approach.After clear assessment of all three structures it was concluded that a combination of centralised and decentralised approaches would be an overall satisfactory method to put in place for most organisations as the main ranges within a retailer would be controlled by Head Office with an experienced buying department but also store level managers would contribute to the buying decisions as they had expertise with what the customer would desire. References Aufreiter, N. , N. Karch and C. Smith Shi (1993) The locomotive engine of success in retailing.McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 101-116. Bruce, M. (2004). Th e anatomy of retail buying. In Butterworth-Heinemann, E International retail marketing a case study approach . Oxford Elsevier Ltd. 64-68. Diamond & Pintel. (2008). The Buyers manipulation. In Vernon R. A Retail Buying. 8th ed. New Jersey Pearson Education Inc.. 3-32. DuBrin, A. (2009). Organizing. In Calhoun, J and Acuna, M Essentials Of Management. 8th ed. Mason South-Western Cengage Learning. 219-295. Fernie, J et al. (2003). Principles of Retailing. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann. p145-150 Goworek, H. (2001).The Role of the Fashion Buyer. In Blackwell Science Ltd Fashion Buying. Great Britain DP Photsetting. 4-14. Hirschman, E. C. Stampfl, R. W. (1980). Roles of retailing in the diffusion of popular culture Microperspectives. diary of Retailing 56 Kang, KY. (1999). Conceptual poser Retail Buying Process. In Kang, KY Development of an Assortment Planning Model for Fashion Sensitive Products. 1-14. Kokemuller, N. (n. d). Decentralized Company Business Structure. available http //smallbusiness. chron. com/decentralized-company-business-structure-20629. tml. Marks and Spencer. (2013). Careers. Available http//corporate. marksandspencer. com/mscareers/opportunities/head_office_roles/headoffice_buying. McGolderick, P. (2002). Product Selection and Buying. In Alcock, T and Howell, C Retail Marketing. 2nd ed. Berkshire McGraw-Hill Education. 279-301. Morrell, L. (2010). The benefits of local sourcing. Available http//www. retail-week. com/in-business/supply-chain/the-benefits-of-local-sourcing/5010688. article. Rosenbloom, B (1981). Retail Marketing. New York Random House. Singer, N and Abelson, R. (2010).After Recalls of Drugs, a Congressional Spotlight on J. J. s Chief. Available http//www. nytimes. com/2010/09/29/business/29tylenol. html? pagewanted=all_r=0. Stampfl, R. W (1978). Structural constrains, consumerism and the market concept, MSU Business Topics, 2 (4), 37-66. Varley, R. (2005). The Role of Product Retail Managers. In Taylor and Francis Retail p roduct management buying and merchandising . 2nd ed. Oxon Routledge Ltd. 21-41. Wang, L. (2010). Buying committees in Chinese retail industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 22 (4), 492-511.